The method
Published in full, before you buy any of it.
Five stages that take a business from “performance isn’t what it should be” to a change that is running and measured — and then end.
The method is the most valuable asset a firm without case studies can own. It lets you judge the thinking before there is any track record to judge. There is no gating and no email capture: giving it away is the marketing.
01
Picture
What do the economics of this business actually say, and what does its market actually allow?
02
Focus
Where is value or performance being constrained, and what is that constraint worth?
03
Direction
What has to change, why, in what order, and what is it worth doing?
04
Build
How does that change become operational in this business?
05
Autonomy
Can the client run, measure and improve this without us?
Each stage commits more than the last. Nothing is decided before the evidence supports it.
The method
01
Picture
What do the economics of this business actually say, and what does its market actually allow?
- We do
- We gather and analyse the evidence, interview leadership and commercial staff, and talk to customers or lost deals where that is available.
- The end state
- An evidenced read of performance — margin, mix, pricing, customer and segment economics, cost-to-serve — set against market, competitive and customer reality.
Picture is not a financial review. Numbers alone explain the past. The stage is only complete when the economics have been read against the market — that pairing is the whole point of the firm.
02
Focus
Where is value or performance being constrained, and what is that constraint worth?
- We do
- We rank by value, say what we are not doing, and put a number against each deferred item so the decision can be revisited honestly later.
- The end state
- A named constraint and a ranked shortlist, each with an indicative value. Everything else is explicitly deferred.
Focus is not a workshop. Naming one constraint and ranking the rest by value is a judgement, made with evidence, and the hardest political act in the sequence.
03
Direction
What has to change, why, in what order, and what is it worth doing?
- We do
- We decide with leadership rather than presenting to it, model the options, write the case, sequence the work and specify who is needed.
- The end state
- A decided direction with the business case, the sequence and the assumptions written down and testable.
Direction is not a deck. It carries a business case: what the change is worth, what it costs, what it depends on.
04
Build
How does that change become operational in this business?
- We do
- We own the direction, select and brief specialists, orchestrate delivery, quality-assure the output and install the cadence that keeps it running.
- The end state
- The change running — whether it is pricing, proposition, portfolio, sales, marketing, organisation, process, technology or orchestrated specialist execution.
Build is not a commercial pipeline. It is whatever the diagnosis requires. A Build might be a price architecture, a portfolio rationalisation, a repositioning, a new sales model, a marketing rebuild delivered by specialists, an operating cadence, or a process change.
05
Autonomy
Can the client run, measure and improve this without us?
- We do
- We document, train, review performance against the business case that justified the work, and withdraw.
- The end state
- Documentation, training, a review rhythm, performance measured against the case — and FiMa’s exit.
Autonomy is not a goodbye. Ending the dependency is the promise, so it is a stage with artefacts and a date.
The stages are used as plain nouns — “we’re in Focus”, “the Build stage”. No acronym, no trademark symbol, no capitalised system name.
Coverage
The method works for every kind of performance problem.
The sequence does not change. What Focus names, and what Build turns out to be, change completely.
| Coverage | Focus | Build |
|---|---|---|
| Growth has stalled | Segment or proposition constraint | Repositioning and a new route to market |
| Revenue up, profit flat | Mix, pricing or cost-to-serve | Price architecture and portfolio decisions |
| Underpricing | Value capture below value delivered | Pricing model, discount governance, sales enablement |
| Unprofitable customers | Customer economics and cost-to-serve | Segment policy, service tiers, exit or reprice |
| Portfolio too broad | Capacity consumed by low-contribution lines | Rationalisation and reallocation |
| Repositioning needed | Undifferentiated proposition | Positioning, proposition, and specialist-executed expression |
| Market entry | Segment attractiveness and economics | Entry model, channel, commercial build |
| Everything runs through the owner | Organisational constraint | Operating model, roles, cadence |
| Marketing spend unaccountable | Acquisition economics unmeasured | Measurement framework, budget logic, specialist rebrief |
The credibility comes from the sequence being obviously sensible, not from it being branded.
Start with the Picture.
Request a consultation45 minutes with a principal. No deck, no pitch. If we’re not the right answer, we’ll say so.
